News & Insights

Our Subject Matter Experts explore market conditions, government regulations and changing needs impacting the products and partners Charles Jones serves.

Charles Jones Team

Recent Posts

Due Diligence Search Guide: Liens, Tax, Title & More

Posted by Charles Jones Team on Sep 29, 2026, 2:00:05 PM

Due Diligence Search 1

A due diligence search uses public records to verify important information and identify potential risks before moving forward with a transaction. Depending on what you need to uncover, due diligence may involve lien, tax, title, UCC, corporate, court record, and other specialized searches.

What this article covers:

  • How to determine which due diligence searches may fit your needs
  • When lien, tax, title, corporate, UCC, and court record searches are used
  • What different searches can help verify or uncover
  • How to navigate the due diligence process and select the proper searches

Start Your Due Diligence Investigation With the Right Questions

An effective due diligence investigation starts by defining what you need to learn—not by choosing a search first. The right searches depend on the transaction, the subject being researched, and the information needed to assess potential issues.

What Are You Trying to Verify or Uncover?

Before beginning the due diligence process, identify the specific questions the investigation needs to answer. For example:

  • Are there liens or judgments involving a person or business?
  • Are there outstanding taxes or other property-related obligations?
  • Who owns a property, and what recorded interests may affect it?
  • Is a business entity active and in good standing?
  • Are there existing security interests involving business assets?
  • Is there pending litigation that may be relevant to the transaction?
  • Are there other property-specific or compliance considerations that require research?

Starting with clear questions helps narrow the scope and determine which public records and searches are relevant.

Why the Scope and Jurisdiction of the Diligence Investigation Matter

Public records are maintained by different government offices and at different jurisdictional levels. The records available—and where they must be searched—can also vary depending on the subject and type of information being researched.

A thorough due diligence process therefore considers who or what is being searched, what needs to be verified, and where the relevant records may be maintained. Defining those factors early helps keep the investigation focused and reduces the risk of relying on a search that answers a different question.

Using Public Records to Identify Potential Risks

Public records can reveal different types of information about a person, business, or property. Because no single search provides a complete picture, the proper searches depend on the potential risks and questions involved in the transaction.

Use this quick-reference guide as a starting point:

If you need to… Search category to consider
Identify judgments or liens involving a person or business Judgment or Lien Search
Check property taxes, assessments, or related obligations Tax Search
Research property ownership and recorded interests Title or County Search
Identify existing security interests involving business assets UCC Search
Verify a business entity or obtain corporate records Corporate Search
Research litigation or other relevant court activity Court Record Search
Determine whether a property is in a designated flood hazard area Flood Search
Investigate potential tideland or wetland considerations Tideland or Wetland Search
Screen names against applicable sanctions or restricted-party records Patriot Name Search

These searches answer different questions, which is why a due diligence review may require more than one. The goal is not to order every available search, but to identify the records that are relevant to the transaction and the risks being assessed.

When to Use a Judgment or Lien Search

A judgment or lien search can be an important part of due diligence when you need to identify legal claims or financial obligations involving a person, business, or property. Depending on the scope of the search, records may reveal judgments, bankruptcy records, tax liens, mechanics liens, or other liens that could affect a transaction.

What a Lien Search Can Help Uncover

Liens generally represent a legal claim or interest tied to an obligation. For buyers, lenders, attorneys, and other parties conducting due diligence, identifying relevant liens can help clarify whether another party may have a claim against property or assets involved in the transaction.

Judgments require similar attention. A court judgment may result in a lien against a debtor’s property, making judgment research relevant when assessing obligations that could affect a real estate purchase, lending decision, or other business transaction.

Tax Liens and Other Financial Claims

Tax liens can arise when taxes remain unpaid and a government authority establishes a legal claim against the taxpayer’s property. Depending on the circumstances and jurisdiction, relevant records may include federal, state, or other tax liens.

It is important, however, to distinguish a tax lien search from a property tax search. A lien search looks for recorded claims, while a property tax search can provide information about the tax billing and payment status of a specific property. Understanding the question you need answered helps determine which search—or combination of searches—is appropriate.

Tax Searches for Property Due Diligence

When due diligence involves real property, a tax search can help verify the property’s tax billing and payment status and identify outstanding amounts or other tax-related information that may need attention before a transaction moves forward.

Depending on the search and the records available, this research may provide information about property taxes, assessments, and related municipal or utility obligations. Reviewing these records can help a buyer, lender, title professional, or attorney identify financial obligations that could affect a real estate transaction.

Tax Search vs. Tax Lien Search

Although the terms sound similar, they can serve different purposes. A property tax search can provide information about a property's tax billing and payment status, applicable charges, and municipal tax liens identified in the relevant records. A tax lien search focuses specifically on identifying liens filed because of unpaid tax obligations.

The scope of these searches can vary depending on the jurisdiction and records being researched. Understanding what information you need to verify helps determine which search—or combination of searches—is appropriate.

Title and County Searches for Property Due Diligence

When the due diligence process requires a closer look at real property, title and county searches can help establish ownership and uncover recorded documents or interests that may affect the property. These searches focus on the public records associated with the property rather than solely on the individuals or businesses involved in the transaction.

Chain of Title, Ownership, and Recorded Property Interests

Depending on the scope of the search, property records can provide information about the current owner, ownership history, deeds, mortgages, easements, and other recorded interests.

Reviewing these records helps build a clearer picture of the property's chain of title and record history and can identify matters that may require additional review before a buyer, lender, or other party moves forward with a real estate transaction.

Why Title and Judgment Searches Answer Different Questions

A title or county search and a judgment search may both be part of property due diligence, but they serve different purposes. Title and county research focuses on the property and its recorded history, while judgment research focuses on judgments involving the people or entities connected to the transaction.

Understanding that distinction helps prevent one search from being treated as a substitute for another. When both the property and the parties involved need to be evaluated, multiple searches may be appropriate to provide the necessary information.

When a UCC Search Is Part of Due Diligence

Business professionals reviewing documents together at a desk.

A UCC search can be an important part of due diligence when a transaction involves business assets or secured lending. Under the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), creditors can file financing statements to provide public notice of a security interest in a debtor’s assets.

Searching UCC filings can help lenders, attorneys, buyers, and other parties identify existing security interests that may be relevant to a loan, asset purchase, or other business transaction.

UCC Search With Listings vs. Copies

The level of detail needed can help determine which type of UCC search is appropriate.

A UCC search with listings provides a summary of filings identified by the search and may be useful when the initial goal is to determine what filings exist.

A UCC search with copies goes a step further by providing the underlying filing documents for review. This can be useful when the due diligence review requires a closer look at information contained within the UCC filings rather than a listing alone.

In either case, the goal is to understand what security interests have been identified in the relevant public records and determine whether they require further review as part of the transaction.

Corporate Searches and Document Retrieval

When due diligence involves a business entity, corporate searches can help verify information about the company, while document retrieval provides access to filings maintained in public records. The right option depends largely on whether you need to confirm an entity’s legal status, review its filing history, or obtain official documentation.

Verifying Entity Status and Good Standing

A status or information report can provide information about an entity when the purpose is research or preliminary due diligence. When formal evidence is required, a Good Standing or Legal Existence Certificate may be appropriate to confirm that the entity exists and, depending on the jurisdiction, has satisfied applicable filing or reporting requirements.

The distinction comes down to information versus official evidence: an informational report may support a diligence review, while a state-issued certificate may be needed when another party requires formal verification.

When Corporate Documents or Certified Copies Are Needed

Corporate document retrieval can provide formation documents, amendments, merger filings, and other records associated with an entity. How those documents will be used helps determine what to obtain.

Plain copies may be sufficient when documents are needed for internal review or research. Certified copies provide certification that the documents are true copies of records maintained by the applicable filing office and may be required when they will be submitted as official documentation.

Determining the purpose of the document review upfront helps ensure the appropriate records—and the appropriate form of those records—are obtained.

Court Record Searches for a More Complete Diligence Investigation

Some potential risks may only become visible when the diligence investigation extends to court records. A court record search can help identify litigation involving an individual or business that may be relevant when assessing a transaction.

This research can complement lien, UCC, corporate, and other public record searches by addressing a different question: Has the person or entity been involved in legal proceedings that warrant further review?

Determining the Appropriate Scope of the Search

The appropriate scope depends on what is being investigated and where relevant records may be maintained. A broader search may be useful when the location of potential court activity is uncertain, while a more targeted search can make sense when the relevant jurisdiction is already known.

Depending on the search and available records, research may identify pending litigation, judgments, bankruptcy information, or other court activity. Because court systems and record availability can vary, defining the subject and appropriate jurisdictions is an important part of conducting the proper searches.

Other Due Diligence Searches to Consider

Not every due diligence review stops with liens, taxes, title, corporate records, or litigation. Depending on the property, transaction, and compliance requirements involved, additional searches may be necessary to address more specialized risks.

Flood Determinations and Life-of-Loan Monitoring

A flood determination identifies whether a property is located within a designated flood hazard area and whether applicable flood insurance requirements may apply. For lenders, life-of-loan monitoring can provide ongoing updates when changes to flood maps affect a property's flood status during the life of a loan.

Tideland and Wetland Searches

Certain properties may require additional research into tideland or wetland considerations. These specialized searches can help identify claims, interests, or environmental designations that may affect the property and warrant further review as part of the transaction.

Patriot Name and Sanctions Searches

When a financial or business transaction involves sanctions-screening or compliance requirements, a Patriot Name Search can be used to screen individuals or entities against applicable government-maintained sanctions and restricted-party records, including records maintained by the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC).

These specialized searches illustrate why due diligence should be shaped by the specific risks and requirements of the transaction rather than a standard checklist applied the same way every time.

How to Choose the Right Searches and Make Informed Decisions

Aerial view of homes and streets in a residential neighborhood.

There is no universal due diligence checklist that applies to every transaction. The proper searches depend on what is being evaluated, the potential risks involved, and the information required to make informed decisions.

A practical diligence checklist starts with six steps:

  1. Define the transaction. Identify whether the diligence review involves real estate, lending, an asset purchase, a business transaction, or another matter.
  2. Identify the subject of the search. Determine whether you need to research a person, business entity, property, or a combination of subjects.
  3. Clarify what you need to uncover. Pinpoint the questions the investigation must answer, such as verifying ownership, identifying liens, reviewing UCC filings, confirming legal status, or researching pending litigation.
  4. Determine the relevant jurisdictions. Consider where the applicable public records are maintained based on the subject and information being researched.
  5. Match each question to the proper search. Select searches based on the information they provide rather than relying on one search to answer unrelated questions.
  6. Consider whether additional research is needed. Results from one search may identify information that warrants document review, another search, or further investigation.

A thorough due diligence process is ultimately about obtaining the information relevant to the decision at hand. Starting with clearly defined questions makes it easier to conduct focused research, identify potential issues, and determine which findings may require a closer look.

Navigate Due Diligence Searches With Charles Jones

 

Charles Jones provides public record and due diligence solutions for title, legal, lending, real estate, and business transactions, with services across New Jersey and Pennsylvania as well as nationwide solutions.

Ready to take the next step?

Explore Charles Jones Services & Solutions to find public record searches that fit your transaction.

Why Tideland Searches Are Important

Posted by Charles Jones Team on Jul 7, 2025, 11:39:25 AM

Tideland searches are very important in real estate transactions to uncover if the State of New Jersey has claim to all or a portion of the property. A recent story done by ABC7 Eyewitness News in New York illustrates the need for a tideland search. Click here to read/view the ABC7 news story.

Did You Know? Many of our DTS title plants are 30 years or older.

Posted by Charles Jones Team on Jul 7, 2025, 11:38:11 AM

Many of our title plants are 30 years or older!

Work smarter, faster and save money! Once only a present owner tool, the majority of our title plants are now capable of executing full 30-year searches and higher percentages of two-owner searches than ever before. Our automated title plants can give you the power to complete County Searches yourself - right from your own desktop ... virtually anytime, anywhere! Or have us do the work for you as the plants also allow us to perform searches and pull copies of deeds and mortgages.

Our title plant counties and years of depth include:

  • Ocean County: 33
  • Hunterdon County: 32
  • Monmouth County: 32
  • Somerset County: 32
  • Warren County: 31
  • Atlantic County: 30
  • Burlington County: 30
  • Camden County: 30
  • Morris County: 30
  • Sussex County: 30
  • Hudson County: 27
  • Passaic County:1 15
  • Gloucester County:2 14

Remember the title plants are open even when the records rooms are closed. In this competitive market, get the edge on your competition by providing County Searches even when the courts are closed! Call us today at (800) 792-8888.

1 Plant recordings from 2001 forward; Judgment records dating to 1993.
2 Plant recordings from 2002 forward; Judgment records dating to 1993.

Navigating Daniel's Law and its Impact

Posted by Charles Jones Team on Jul 7, 2025, 11:33:53 AM

November 20, 2020.

That's the day Governor Murphy signed Daniel's Law (P.L.2020, c.125), which altered the Open Public Records Act (OPRA) — as well as other statutes — to prohibit government records custodians from disclosing home addresses of judicial officers, prosecutors, and law enforcement officers. While still supporting protection for these public servants, shortly thereafter, the title community began asking some questions about the impact to searching real property records.

A few years later, many of those questions have been answered but some are works in progress.

Moving Forward:
Much has occurred, however, since that 2020 Fall day and the good news is that before long the wonder and unanswered questions will be a thing of the past.

Recognizing the need to establish a bit of a framework to manage the requirements of Daniel's Law and to successfully achieve the protection the legislation promises, Governor Murphy signed P.L.2021, c.24 into law, amending the law and extending its effective date to December 10, 2021. This move ultimately led to the December 2, 2021 introduction of P.L.2021 c.371 which established the Office of Information Privacy (OIP) within the Department of Community Affairs. That same piece of legislation also instituted January 12, 2023 as the official date of compliance, giving OIP the time needed to meet its mission: to develop the guidelines, policies, procedures and general rules required to facilitate the implementation of Daniel's Law.

That same amendment also amplified the need to address the concerns of Title Producers and Title Searchers who require access to unredacted records in order to successfully manage the transfer of title. To that end, the legislation carved out Title Producers and defined a specific class of organizations — Title Search Business Entities (TSBE) — entitled to receive complete records. Additionally, Section 4a of the law indicates that a Title Search Business Entity, “means any person or entity organized under the laws of this state or another state for the primary purpose of determining the existence of any lien, lawsuit, lease, easement, mortgage or other encumbrance or restriction, or ownership interest, on any property and regularly conducts business with any title insurance company or title insurance agent …”

Section 4b goes on to detail that any “title search business entity conducting business in this State shall register with and be subject to regulation by the Department of Banking and Insurance (DOBI). The business entities must also register with the Division of Revenue and Enterprise Services (DORES) in the Department of the Treasury, or county clerk, as appropriate.”

Under the new law, TSBE's also fall under the regulatory purview of the NJ Department of Banking and Insurance (DOBI). While additional regulations may result from this change, initially DOBI will serve as where TSBE's can be identified to allow for access to unredacted records to facilitate title searching.

So, signing the legislation into law was just the first step. What has occurred thereafter served to provide OIP and many government agencies an opportunity to map out the methods by which Covered Persons can apply for protection while also establishing a method by which Record Custodians can identify redactors responsible for masking the appropriate information. With all of that in line, the focus would then become identifying/registering the title search business entities approved for complete access.

New Director Adds Clarity
Led by Director Christine Campbell, the OIP mobilized quickly and prioritized outlining a plan for building a secure online application portal (www.danielslaw.nj.gov) so that Covered and Authorized Persons — active and retired judicial officers, prosecutors, and law enforcement officers and their immediate families seeking protection under Daniel's Law could formally request their records be redacted. That portal launched on July 12, 2022, well in advance of the date of compliance. Director Campbell and her office also engaged multiple State, County, and Municipal government agencies in order to help each prepare for the demands of the law.

The law maintains that government agencies must redact residential data from public-facing websites and paper records “in their control” for Covered Persons who have been approved for redaction by OIP. And who handles said redactions? Once an agency has identified a redactor, that individual must register with the OIP, also through a secure online portal (www.danielslawredact.nj.gov) designed and managed by the office.

The Takeaway?
Only records attached to Covered Persons approved by OIP — rather than all persons, or all records — shall be redacted and those redactions must only be handled by a registered redactor. This process is facilitated by a Redaction Notice delivered by the OIP direct to the Agency's redactor, and that redactor has 30 days to comply. This is a process that OIP has instituted, and the respective agencies are utilizing today.

That the Director focused on a message centered on redacting only records attached to Covered Persons was a bit of a relief; when the law was first introduced, Charles Jones had some concern that entire record sets would be compromised/removed rather than individual records. However, meeting the demands of the law with surgical redactions provides the protection the law outlines without compromising all title research in the process. The realization that most records will remain untouched significantly altered the possible impact as the only “lawful” redactions are those approved by OIP.

Nowhere in the law is there a suggestion to remove all records. Instead, what exists is a carefully constructed registration and vetting process for Covered Persons, a specific channel for communicating and executing upon the required redactions and a method for those approved for access to view complete records.

In short, that's how it all works. Do questions remain? Certainly. But those answers will come as the final components are put into place and the processes of Daniel's Law become more common, including DOBI's registration portal, which is currently under construction. That site will allow TSBE's the chance to qualify for access to unredacted records while also providing Records Custodians a method for verifying that a TSBE has been approved for access.

What's Next?
Beyond that, there are some other items that only practical experience will help crystallize. Such as:

  • Will TSBE's be validated by DOBI?
    • What will be required to be identified as a TSBE?
  • How will records custodians handle the various requirements in order to provide records to the TSBEs?
    • Will two sets of records be maintained?
  • How will redacted records be managed?
    • Strict removals?
    • False Addresses?
    • Aliases?
  • How will a title searcher be made aware of a potential redacted record that may affect the property in question?
  • How will unredacted records be made available to qualified TSBE's?
  • What is the process for 'unredacting' a record when appropriate?

There is plenty more to learn, but the path that has been created will allow us all to reach those answers, through practical experience and further regulatory efforts to yield consistency. So far, the NJLTA Legislative Committee has remained in contact with the Director of OIP and DOBI to learn as much as possible. And, we have yet to encounter a circumstance where we haven't been able to acquire the record, and information we need. That's thanks to the thoughtful approach taken thus far and the framework that has been established. Complexity connected to the law is part of the landscape now, but we're confident we'll continue to work through the nuances successfully.

Stay tuned!

Subscribe Here!

Recent Posts

Posts by Tag